From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Varone v. Memoli

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jun 5, 1986
121 A.D.2d 213 (N.Y. App. Div. 1986)

Opinion

June 5, 1986

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Bronx County (Irma V. Santaella, J.).


The plaintiff was treated by the defendant physician at a hospital in The Bronx and subsequent visits were at the Bronx office of the defendant.

In granting the motion to change venue to Westchester County from Bronx County, where the action was commenced, the court bottomed its determination on the basis that neither party resided in Bronx County, the plaintiffs-appellants residing in Pelham Manor and the defendant-respondent physician residing in Scarsdale. However, all of the activities involved took place in Bronx County and, accordingly, the plaintiffs' choice of Bronx County for the litigation is proper for such a transitory action. (See, Mayer v. Fleischner, 92 A.D.2d 463.)

Concur — Kupferman, J.P., Fein, Lynch, Milonas and Ellerin, JJ.


Summaries of

Varone v. Memoli

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jun 5, 1986
121 A.D.2d 213 (N.Y. App. Div. 1986)
Case details for

Varone v. Memoli

Case Details

Full title:MINNIE VARONE et al., Appellants, v. RICHARD MEMOLI, Respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Jun 5, 1986

Citations

121 A.D.2d 213 (N.Y. App. Div. 1986)

Citing Cases

McKenna v. Occhigrossi

Both plaintiffs and the defendant reside in Westchester County. Plaintiffs, however, placed venue in Bronx…

Gousgounis v. Bravor Plumbing Heating Co.

Viewing the matter from a discretionary standpoint, we find that venue was properly placed in New York County…