From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Vanriel v. Lumber Headquarters

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 24, 2000
271 A.D.2d 684 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)

Opinion

Submitted March 6, 2000.

April 24, 2000.

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the defendant Lumber Headquarters appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Milano, J.), dated February 19, 1999, which denied its motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and all cross claims insofar as asserted against it.

Torino Bernstein, P.C., Mineola, N.Y. (Kenneth A. Bernstein of counsel), for appellant.

The Yankowitz Law Firm, P.C., Great Neck, N.Y. (Michael Brumer of counsel), for plaintiffs-respondents.

GUY JAMES MANGANO, P.J., LAWRENCE J. BRACKEN, LEO F. McGINITY, DANIEL F. LUCIANO, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with costs.

Although the appellant made out a prima facie case in its motion for summary judgment, the plaintiffs established, in opposition thereto, that issues of fact exist regarding whether the presence of flowing water emanating from a yard adjacent to the appellant's store constituted a defective condition, and whether the appellant owned or controlled the yard from where the water emanated (see,Montalvo v. Western Estates, 240 A.D.2d 45 ; Lopez v. City of New York, 259 A.D.2d 601 ).


Summaries of

Vanriel v. Lumber Headquarters

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 24, 2000
271 A.D.2d 684 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
Case details for

Vanriel v. Lumber Headquarters

Case Details

Full title:Antonio Vanriel, etc., et al., plaintiffs-respondents, v. Lumber…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Apr 24, 2000

Citations

271 A.D.2d 684 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
707 N.Y.S.2d 868