From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Vaniewsky v. Demarest Bros. Co.

Court of Errors and Appeals
Feb 2, 1931
107 N.J.L. 389 (N.J. 1931)

Opinion

Submitted May 29, 1930 —

Decided February 2, 1931.

On appeal from the Supreme Court, whose opinion is reported in 106 N.J.L. 34.

For the appellant, Seufert Elmore.

For the respondents, Harley, Cox Walburg.


The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Lloyd in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — THE CHIEF JUSTICE, PARKER, CAMPBELL, CASE, BODINE, DALY, DONGES, VAN BUSKIRK, KAYS, HETFIELD, DEAR, WELLS, JJ. 12.

For reversal — None.


Summaries of

Vaniewsky v. Demarest Bros. Co.

Court of Errors and Appeals
Feb 2, 1931
107 N.J.L. 389 (N.J. 1931)
Case details for

Vaniewsky v. Demarest Bros. Co.

Case Details

Full title:ISAAC VANIEWSKY, APPELLANT, v. DEMAREST BROTHERS COMPANY ET AL.…

Court:Court of Errors and Appeals

Date published: Feb 2, 1931

Citations

107 N.J.L. 389 (N.J. 1931)
154 A. 623

Citing Cases

State v. Hawkins

See State v. Dancyger, 29 N.J. 76, 92-93 (1959), cert. den. 360 U.S. 903, 79 S.Ct. 1286, 3 L.Ed.2d 1255…

Reid v. Monmouth Oil Co.

However, on a new trial Agnellino cannot be held under the doctrine of respondeat superior for the acts or…