From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Vanderhorst v. Saul

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Jul 29, 2019
17cv10205 (S.D.N.Y. Jul. 29, 2019)

Opinion

17cv10205

07-29-2019

CARMEN LUISA VANDERHORST, Plaintiff, v. ANDREW M. SAUL, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant.


ORDER

:

Plaintiff Carmen Luisa Vanderhorst commenced this action seeking judicial review of the Social Security Administration's (the "Commissioner") denial of her application for disability insurance benefits and supplemental social security income. 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). On January 23, 2018, this Court referred the matter to Magistrate Judge Debra C. Freeman for a report and recommendation. Thereafter, both Vanderhorst and the Commissioner moved for judgment on the pleadings. On June 25, 2019, Magistrate Judge Freeman issued her Report and Recommendation, recommending that this Court deny Vanderhorst's motion and grant the Commissioner's motion. No objections to the Report and Recommendation were filed.

Andrew M. Saul, having been appointed Commissioner of the Social Security Administration, is substituted for Acting Commissioner Nancy A. Berryhill, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 25(d). --------

A district court "may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations made by the magistrate judge." 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C). In reviewing a Report and Recommendation when there are no objections, a court "need only satisfy itself that there is no clear error on the face of the record." Simms v. Graham, 2011 WL 6072400, at *1 (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 6, 2011).

This Court has reviewed Magistrate Judge Freeman's thorough and well-reasoned Report and Recommendation, and finds that it is not erroneous on its face. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C). Accordingly, this Court adopts the Report and Recommendation in its entirety. The parties' failure to file written objections to the Report and Recommendation precludes appellate review of this decision. See Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 155 (1985).

Accordingly, Vanderhorst's motion for judgment on the pleadings is denied, and the Commissioner's motion for judgment on the pleadings is granted. The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate the motions pending at ECF Nos. 12 and 14, and mark this case as closed. Dated: July 29, 2019

New York, New York

SO ORDERED:

/s/_________

WILLIAM H. PAULEY III

U.S.D.J.


Summaries of

Vanderhorst v. Saul

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Jul 29, 2019
17cv10205 (S.D.N.Y. Jul. 29, 2019)
Case details for

Vanderhorst v. Saul

Case Details

Full title:CARMEN LUISA VANDERHORST, Plaintiff, v. ANDREW M. SAUL, Commissioner of…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Date published: Jul 29, 2019

Citations

17cv10205 (S.D.N.Y. Jul. 29, 2019)

Citing Cases

Negron v. Saul

See Vanderhorst v. Berryhill, No. 17CV10205 (WHP) (DF), 2019 WL 3416003, at *12, 14 (S.D.N.Y. June 25, 2019),…

Lupo v. Saul

See Heitz v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec., 201 F. Supp. 3d 413 (S.D.N.Y. 2016) (ALJ's finding that claimant retained…