From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Van Tuyl v. Sullivan

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Mar 14, 1916
112 N.E. 1078 (N.Y. 1916)

Opinion

Argued February 29, 1916

Decided March 14, 1916

William G. Cooke and Howard O. Wood for appellants.

Joseph G. Deane and Philip A. Walter for respondent.


Order affirmed, with costs, and question certified answered in the affirmative; no opinion.

Concur: WILLARD BARTLETT, Ch. J., HISCOCK, COLLIN, CUDDEBACK, HOGAN, SEABURY and POUND, JJ.


Summaries of

Van Tuyl v. Sullivan

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Mar 14, 1916
112 N.E. 1078 (N.Y. 1916)
Case details for

Van Tuyl v. Sullivan

Case Details

Full title:GEORGE C. VAN TUYL, JR., as Superintendent of Banks of the State of New…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Mar 14, 1916

Citations

112 N.E. 1078 (N.Y. 1916)
112 N.E. 1078

Citing Cases

Broderick v. McGuire

Banking Law, § 79; Broderick v. Aaron, 264 N.Y.S. 15, 18. The right of a superintendent of banks to levy such…

Superintendent of Banks of N.Y. v. Moors

An action at law lies to enforce it. Van Tuyl v. Sullivan, 173 App. Div. (N.Y.) 391, 394, 395. Van Tuyl v.…