Argued February 27, 1917
Decided March 13, 1917
Samuel S. Koenig and Milton M. Sittenfield for appellant.
Emery H. Sykes for respondent.
Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: HISCOCK, Ch. J., CHASE, CUDDEBACK, HOGAN, POUND, McLAUGHLIN and ANDREWS, JJ.
Full title:GEORGE C. VAN TUYL, JR., as Superintendent of Banks of the State of New…
Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Date published: Mar 13, 1917
When the stockholder acquires his stock he enters into an implied contract on his part that he will be liable…
State of Indiana v. HoffmanThe enforcement of it only is postponed." ( Van Tuyl v. Schwab, (1916) 174 App. Div. 665 [161 N.Y. Supp.…