From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Van Kleeck v. State of New York

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Nov 29, 1966
223 N.E.2d 41 (N.Y. 1966)

Opinion

Argued October 18, 1966

Decided November 29, 1966

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Third Judicial Department, HENRY W. LENGYEL, J.

Guido J. Napoletano and William J. Ryan for appellants-respondents.

Louis J. Lefkowitz, Attorney-General ( Julius L. Sackman and Ruth Kessler Toch of counsel), for respondent-appellant.


MEMORANDUM.

The order appealed from should be modified (see Cornell v. T.V. Development Corp., 17 N.Y.2d 69, 73). Since the property was valued on a commercial basis, no value should have been assigned to the buildings on the property, which were inconsistent with that use ( Matter of Erlanger, 237 N.Y. 159, 164; Spano v. State of New York, 22 A.D.2d 757). Accordingly, the order of the Appellate Division is modified to the extent of striking therefrom so much as awards $15,000 for the buildings and, as modified, the order is affirmed, with costs.

Chief Judge DESMOND and Judges FULD, VAN VOORHIS, BURKE, SCILEPPI, BERGAN and KEATING concur.

Order modified in accordance with the memorandum herein and, as so modified, affirmed, with costs.


Summaries of

Van Kleeck v. State of New York

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Nov 29, 1966
223 N.E.2d 41 (N.Y. 1966)
Case details for

Van Kleeck v. State of New York

Case Details

Full title:RALPH VAN KLEECK et al., Appellants-Respondents, v. STATE OF NEW YORK…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Nov 29, 1966

Citations

223 N.E.2d 41 (N.Y. 1966)
223 N.E.2d 41
276 N.Y.S.2d 633

Citing Cases

Pascack Motel, Inc. v. State

We must, therefore, reject the amount of the award for improvements made by the trial court. Although the…

In re City of New York

" ( Matter of Town of Hempstead [Malibu Assoc.], 56 NY2d 1020, 1022 [1982].) Stated more succinctly, "[i]t is…