From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Van Hoesen v. Gelfen

Court of Errors and Appeals
Feb 1, 1932
158 A. 343 (N.J. 1932)

Opinion

Decided February 1st, 1932.

On appeal from a decree of the court of chancery.

Mr. Harold Bouton, for the respondent.

Messrs. Kraemer, Siegler Siegler, for the appellant.


The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Buchanan, and reported in 103 N.J. Eq. 234. For affirmance — THE CHIEF-JUSTICE, TRENCHARD, PARKER, CAMPBELL, LLOYD, CASE, BODINE, DALY, DONGES, VAN BUSKIRK, KAYS, HETFIELD, DEAR, WELLS, KERNEY, JJ. 15.

For reversal — None.


Summaries of

Van Hoesen v. Gelfen

Court of Errors and Appeals
Feb 1, 1932
158 A. 343 (N.J. 1932)
Case details for

Van Hoesen v. Gelfen

Case Details

Full title:STEPHEN G. VAN HOESEN et al., respondent, v. SAMUEL GELFEN et al.…

Court:Court of Errors and Appeals

Date published: Feb 1, 1932

Citations

158 A. 343 (N.J. 1932)
158 A. 343

Citing Cases

St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance v. New Jersey Bank & Trust Co.

The rule that the release of security by the creditor will be held to exonerate the surety to the extent of…

Mann v. Bugbee

A partial release of the principal debtor discharges the surety pro tanto ( 50 C.J. 184), and a release of…