From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Van Dusen v. Mullin

United States District Court, W.D. Oklahoma
Dec 14, 2006
Case No. CIV-06-295-M (W.D. Okla. Dec. 14, 2006)

Summary

denying habeas relief on grounds that petitioner failed to show that counsel's preliminary hearing waiver was either deficient or prejudicial

Summary of this case from Williamson v. Parker

Opinion

Case No. CIV-06-295-M.

December 14, 2006


ORDER


On November 7, 2006, United States Magistrate Judge Robert E. Bacharach issued a Report and Recommendation in this action brought pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254, seeking a writ of habeas corpus. The Magistrate Judge recommended the denial of petitioner's requests for an evidentiary hearing and the issuance of a writ of habeas corpus. Petitioner was advised of his right to object to the Report and Recommendation by November 27, 2006. On November 28, 2006, petitioner filed his objections. In his objections, petitioner objects to the Report and Recommendation in its entirety.

Having carefully reviewed this matter de novo, the Court:

(1) ADOPTS the thorough and well-reasoned Report and Recommendation issued by the Magistrate Judge on November 7, 2006;
(2) DENIES petitioner's request for an evidentiary hearing;
(3) DENIES the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus; and
(4) ORDERS that judgment in favor of respondents issue forthwith.
IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Van Dusen v. Mullin

United States District Court, W.D. Oklahoma
Dec 14, 2006
Case No. CIV-06-295-M (W.D. Okla. Dec. 14, 2006)

denying habeas relief on grounds that petitioner failed to show that counsel's preliminary hearing waiver was either deficient or prejudicial

Summary of this case from Williamson v. Parker
Case details for

Van Dusen v. Mullin

Case Details

Full title:JASON VAN DUSEN, Petitioner, v. MIKE MULLIN, Warden, OSP, and THE ATTORNEY…

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Oklahoma

Date published: Dec 14, 2006

Citations

Case No. CIV-06-295-M (W.D. Okla. Dec. 14, 2006)

Citing Cases

Williamson v. Parker

Strickland, 466 U.S. at 690, 694. So, the undersigned recommends that the court deny habeas relief on this…

Maupin v. Harpe

” Van Dusen v. Mullin, No. CIV-06-295-M, 2006 WL 3693368, at *3 (W.D. Okla. Dec. 14, 2006).…