From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Van Dorn v. W.H. Jackson Auto Sales, Inc.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
May 21, 1940
28 N.E.2d 33 (N.Y. 1940)

Opinion

Argued April 24, 1940

Decided May 21, 1940

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, NOLAN, J.

H.H. Brown, Alfred M. Bailey and E.C. Sherwood for appellant.

Sydney A. Syme for respondents.


Judgment affirmed, with costs. We hold that the doctrine of MacPherson v. Buick Motor Co. ( 217 N.Y. 382) applies in the relationship of these plaintiffs and the defendant. No opinion.

Concur: LEHMAN, Ch. J., LOUGHRAN, FINCH, RIPPEY, SEARS, LEWIS and CONWAY, JJ.


Summaries of

Van Dorn v. W.H. Jackson Auto Sales, Inc.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
May 21, 1940
28 N.E.2d 33 (N.Y. 1940)
Case details for

Van Dorn v. W.H. Jackson Auto Sales, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:MILDRED VAN DORN et al., Respondents, v. W.H. JACKSON AUTO SALES, INC.…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: May 21, 1940

Citations

28 N.E.2d 33 (N.Y. 1940)
28 N.E.2d 33

Citing Cases

Swensson v. New York, Albany Desp. Co.

This and the trips to Paramus, New Jersey, Plattsburgh and Saranac Lake could well have weakened an otherwise…

LA ROCCA v. FARRINGTON

MacPherson v. Buick Motor Co., 217 N.Y. 382, 388, 389, 390,111 N.E. 1050, 1052, 1053, L.R.A.1916F, 696,…