From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Valley v. Rapides Parish School Board

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Feb 26, 1999
169 F.3d 216 (5th Cir. 1999)

Opinion

No. 97-30323.

February 26, 1999.

Gregory Bryan Friel, U.S. Dept. of Justice, Civil Rights Division, Appellate Section, Mark L. Gross, U.S. Dept. of Justice, Civil Rights Division, Washington, DC, for Intervenor Plaintiff-Appellee.

Robert L. Hammonds, Hammonds Sills, Baton Rouge, LA, for Defendant-Appellee.

James Carl Hrdlicka, Baton Rouge, LA, Gina Puleio Campo, Bolinger Walker, New Orleans, LA, for Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana; Nauman S. Scott, Judge.

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING AND SUGGESTION FOR REHEARING EN BANC (Opinion June 26, 1998, 5 Cir., 1998, 145 F.3d 329).

Before KING, Chief Judge, and POLITZ, JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, JONES, SMITH, DUHEacute, WIENER, BARKSDALE, EMILIO M. GARZA, DeMOSS, BENAVIDES, STEWART, PARKER and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.


A member of the Court in active service having requested a poll on the suggestion for rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,

IT IS ORDERED that this cause shall be reheard by the court en banc with oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. The Clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of supplemental briefs.


Summaries of

Valley v. Rapides Parish School Board

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Feb 26, 1999
169 F.3d 216 (5th Cir. 1999)
Case details for

Valley v. Rapides Parish School Board

Case Details

Full title:VIRGIE LEE VALLEY, ET AL., PLAINTIFFS, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit

Date published: Feb 26, 1999

Citations

169 F.3d 216 (5th Cir. 1999)