Opinion
No. 76368
09-14-2018
ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR WRIT OF PROHIBITION
This petition for a writ of prohibition challenges the district court's denial of a motion for reconsideration of a motion to quash service in a personal injury action. Having considered the petition and appendices filed in this matter, we are not persuaded that our extraordinary and discretionary intervention is warranted. See NRS 34.320; Pan v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 120 Nev. 222, 228, 88 P.3d 840, 844 (2004) ("Petitioners carry the burden of demonstrating that extraordinary relief is warranted."); Abreu v. Gilmer, 115 Nev. 308, 312, 985 P.2d 746, 749 (1999) (noting that the district court has discretion to make due diligence determinations in challenges to service of process). Accordingly, we
ORDER the petition DENIED.
/s/_________, J.
Cherry /s/_________, J.
Parraguirre /s/_________, J.
Stiglich cc: Hon. William D, Kephart, District Judge
Atkin Winner & Sherrod
The Schnitzer Law Firm
Eighth District Court Clerk