From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Valdez v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Jan 22, 1991
573 So. 2d 191 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)

Opinion

No. 90-800.

January 22, 1991.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Monroe County, Richard G. Payne, J.

Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender, and N. Joseph Durant, Jr., Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., and Angelica D. Zayas, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Before BARKDULL, HUBBART and JORGENSON, JJ.


We affirm the final judgment of conviction and sentence for unlawful possession of cocaine upon a holding that the trial court properly denied the defendant's motion to suppress the subject cocaine. Contrary to the defendant's contention, there was no pretextual stop of the defendant shown on this record, and, in any event, such an alleged stop could not taint and render inadmissible at trial the defendant's otherwise voluntary abandonment of the subject cocaine on the public street. See Kehoe v. State, 521 So.2d 1094 (Fla. 1988); State v. Bartee, 568 So.2d 523 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990); State v. Oliver, 368 So.2d 1331 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979), cert. dismissed, 383 So.2d 1200 (Fla. 1980); Freyre v. State, 362 So.2d 989 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978), cert. denied, 372 So.2d 468 (Fla.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 857, 100 S.Ct. 118, 62 L.Ed.2d 76 (1979).

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Valdez v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Jan 22, 1991
573 So. 2d 191 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)
Case details for

Valdez v. State

Case Details

Full title:ENRIQUEZ VALDEZ, APPELLANT, v. THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Jan 22, 1991

Citations

573 So. 2d 191 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)