From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Valdes v. Munich

U.S.
Feb 1, 1909
212 U.S. 568 (1909)

Opinion

ERROR TO THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR PORTO RICO.

Nos. 457, 473, 474.

Motions to dismiss or affirm. — Submitted January 18, 1909. Decided February 1, 1909.

Writs of error to the District Court of the United States for Porto Rico, dismissed for want of jurisdiction because the judgments sought to be reversed were each less than $5,000. Plaintiffs below were citizens of the United States and Porto Rico, and the defendant a citizen of Spain who filed pleas to the jurisdiction and claimed that by the overruling of such pleas he had been denied rights under the treaty of Paris and laws of the United States. Writ of error to review 3 Porto Rico, 251, 503, dismissed.

Mr. Willis Sweet for defendant in error in Nos. 457 and 473, and Mr. Willis Sweet and Mr. Joseph Anderson, Jr., for defendant in error in No. 474, in support of the motion.

Mr. F. Kingsbury Curtis, Mr. John G. Carlisle and Mr. Henry A. Stickney in Nos. 457 and 474; Mr. F. Kingsbury Curtis and Mr. Henry A. Stickney in No. 473 for plaintiff in error, in opposition.


Writs of error dismissed for want of jurisdictional amounts. Act of April 12, 1900, c. 191, 31 Stat. 77, §§ 34, 35; Act of March 2, 1901, c. 812, 31 Stat. 953, § 3; Royal Insurance Company v. Martin, 192 U.S. 149, 159; Ortega v. Lara, 202 U.S. 339; Perez v. Fernandez, 202 U.S. 80; Garrozi v. Dastas, 204 U.S. 64, 73.


Summaries of

Valdes v. Munich

U.S.
Feb 1, 1909
212 U.S. 568 (1909)
Case details for

Valdes v. Munich

Case Details

Full title:VALDES v . MUNICH. SAME v . WOOD. SAME v . PERIANES

Court:U.S.

Date published: Feb 1, 1909

Citations

212 U.S. 568 (1909)