From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Valdes v. Fang Yun Hu

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Aug 25, 2003
307 A.D.2d 1033 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)

Opinion

2001-09752, 2002-09489

Submitted May 14, 2003.

August 25, 2003.

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiff Laura Valdes appeals (1) from a decision of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Milano, J.), dated June 21, 2001, and (2), as limited by her brief, from so much of an order of the same court dated September 20, 2001, as granted the cross motion of the defendants Yoon Kim and Hyun Kim, and the separate cross motion of the defendant Fang Yun Hu, for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted by the plaintiff Laura Valdes on the ground that she did not sustain a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102(d).

Richard S. Heyman, Bronx, N.Y., for appellant.

Picciano Scahill, P.C. (Rivkin Radler LLP, Uniondale, N.Y. [Evan H. Krinick, Cheryl F. Korman, and Harris J. Zakarin] of counsel), for respondents Yoon Kim and Hyun Kim.

Before: FRED T. SANTUCCI, J.P., NANCY E. SMITH, DANIEL F. LUCIANO, ROBERT W. SCHMIDT, WILLIAM F. MASTRO, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the appeal from the decision is dismissed, as no appeal lies from a decision ( see Schicchi v. Green Constr. Corp., 100 A.D.2d 509); and it is further,

ORDERED that the order is reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law, the cross motions are denied, and the complaint insofar as asserted by the plaintiff Laura Valdes is reinstated; and it is further,

ORDERED that one bill of costs is awarded to the plaintiff Laura Valdes.

The defendants failed to make a prima facie showing that the plaintiff Laura Valdes did not sustain a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102(d). In any event, the affidavit of Laura Valdes and the affirmation of her treating physician were sufficient to raise a triable issue of fact as to whether she sustained a medically-determined injury that curtailed her from performing her usual activities "to a great extent rather than some slight curtailment" for the statutory period of time ( Licari v. Elliot, 57 N.Y.2d 230, 236; see Frier v. Teague, 288 A.D.2d 177, 178-179; Marszalek v. Brown, 247 A.D.2d 827).

SANTUCCI, J.P., SMITH, LUCIANO, SCHMIDT and MASTRO, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Valdes v. Fang Yun Hu

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Aug 25, 2003
307 A.D.2d 1033 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
Case details for

Valdes v. Fang Yun Hu

Case Details

Full title:LAURA VALDES, appellant, ET AL., plaintiff, v. FANG YUN HU, ET AL.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Aug 25, 2003

Citations

307 A.D.2d 1033 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
763 N.Y.S.2d 755

Citing Cases

Manzanares v. Aliev

The defendants met their prima facie burden of showing that the plaintiff did not sustain a serious injury…

Bracco v. Zuhir

The appellant met his prima facie burden of establishing that the plaintiff did not sustain a serious injury…