From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Vaine v. Exxon Co. USA

Connecticut Superior Court, Judicial District of Fairfield
Nov 25, 1994
1994 Ct. Sup. 11788 (Conn. Super. Ct. 1994)

Opinion

No. 279465

November 25, 1994


ORDER


"The issue of proximate cause is ordinarily a question of fact for the trier." Maebry v. McNeil, 13 Conn. App. 167, 169 (1988). Here, the trier reasonably could have found that the plaintiff's lighting a cigarette in his automobile after having had gasoline spilled on him, rather than any negligence of the defendant resulting in the spillage itself, was the proximate cause of the plaintiff's ensuing injuries. Cf. Courtney v. American Oil Co., 229 So.2d 675 (Fla.App. 1968), reh. denied.

The objections to the report of the attorney trial referee are overruled. Judgment may enter on the report.

Bruce L. Levin Judge of the Superior Court


Summaries of

Vaine v. Exxon Co. USA

Connecticut Superior Court, Judicial District of Fairfield
Nov 25, 1994
1994 Ct. Sup. 11788 (Conn. Super. Ct. 1994)
Case details for

Vaine v. Exxon Co. USA

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL VAINE vs. EXXON CO. USA

Court:Connecticut Superior Court, Judicial District of Fairfield

Date published: Nov 25, 1994

Citations

1994 Ct. Sup. 11788 (Conn. Super. Ct. 1994)