Opinion
A22D0293
04-11-2022
BRENT MATTHEW VADOVSKY v. THE STATE.
The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:
Brent Matthew Vadovsky pled guilty to aggravated stalking, family violence battery, and family violence aggravated assault, and, on April 12, 2017, the trial court sentenced him to twenty years with the first four years to be served in confinement and the remainder to be served on probation. On November 11, 2021, the trial court revoked the balance of Vadovsky's probated sentence. On February 9, 2022, Vadovsky filed a motion for reconsideration of the revocation. The trial court dismissed the motion on February 22, 2022, and Vadovsky filed this application for discretionary appeal on March 10, 2022. We lack jurisdiction.
To be timely, a discretionary application must be filed within 30 days of entry of the order to be appealed. OCGA § 5-6-35 (d); Hill v. State, 204 Ga.App. 582, 583 (420 S.E.2d 393) (1992). This statutory deadline is jurisdictional, and we cannot accept an application for appeal not made in compliance with OCGA § 5-6-34 (d). Boyle v. State, 190 Ga.App. 734, 734 (380 S.E.2d 57) (1989). Although Vadovsky filed a motion for reconsideration, the denial or dismissal of a motion for reconsideration of an appealable order or judgment is not itself appealable, and a motion for reconsideration does not extend the time for filing a notice of appeal or an application for appeal. See Campbell v. State, 192 Ga.App. 316 (385 S.E.2d 14) (1989); Savage v. Newsome, 173 Ga.App. 271, 271 (326 S.E.2d 5) (1985).
Here, Vadovsky's application is untimely as to the November 11, 2021 probation revocation order because it was filed 119 days after entry of that order, and the application is invalid as to the order dismissing his motion for reconsideration. We thus lack jurisdiction over this application for discretionary appeal, which is hereby DISMISSED.