From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Vadala v. Carroll

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
May 11, 1983
450 N.E.2d 249 (N.Y. 1983)

Opinion

Decided May 11, 1983

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Fourth Judicial Department, THOMAS J. MURPHY, J.

Craig P. Schlanger for appellant.

Francis Maloney, Jr., for respondent.


MEMORANDUM.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs.

The Appellate Division's determination that it was error to have set aside the verdict as against the weight of the evidence, although appealable, is beyond the scope of our review ( Aiello v Garahan, 58 N.Y.2d 1078; Mongelli Carting Co. v Nassau Ins. Co., 57 N.Y.2d 649; Gutin v Mascali Sons, 11 N.Y.2d 97; see Cohen and Karger, Powers of the New York Court of Appeals [rev ed], § 148, p 588). Due to the posture in which this case comes before us, there must be an automatic affirmance ( Goehle v Town of Smithtown, 55 N.Y.2d 995; Rochester Tel. Corp. v Green Is. Constr. Corp., 51 N.Y.2d 788; Pfohl v Wipperman, 34 N.Y.2d 597).

Chief Judge COOKE and Judges JASEN, JONES, WACHTLER, MEYER and SIMONS concur; Judge FUCHSBERG taking no part.

On review of submissions pursuant to rule 500.2 (b) of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 N.Y.CRR 500.2 [g]), order affirmed, with costs, in a memorandum.


Summaries of

Vadala v. Carroll

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
May 11, 1983
450 N.E.2d 249 (N.Y. 1983)
Case details for

Vadala v. Carroll

Case Details

Full title:PAUL D. VADALA et al., Appellants, v. RANDALL CARROLL, Respondent

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: May 11, 1983

Citations

450 N.E.2d 249 (N.Y. 1983)
450 N.E.2d 249
463 N.Y.S.2d 443

Citing Cases

Nicastro v. Park

ry (Cohen v Hallmark Cards, supra, at p 498; McDonald v Metropolitan St. Ry. Co., 167 N.Y. 66; O'Boyle v Avis…

Dummitt v. Chesterton (In re N.Y. City Asbestos Litig.)

g, without deciding, that the court should not have allowed the jury to consider the applicability of the…