V-ME Media, Inc. v. Rios

Full title: V-ME MEDIA, INC., et al., Petitioners, v. Urpi RIOS, Respondent.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Date published: Sep 22, 2021

326 So. 3d 202 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2021)

Opinion

No. 3D20-1555

09-22-2021

V-ME MEDIA, INC., et al., Petitioners, v. Urpi RIOS, Respondent.

Sodhi Spoont PLLC, and Eric M. Sodhi and Joshua L. Spoont, for petitioners. RC Law Group, and Ria N. Chattergoon (Hollywood), for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

Sodhi Spoont PLLC, and Eric M. Sodhi and Joshua L. Spoont, for petitioners.

RC Law Group, and Ria N. Chattergoon (Hollywood), for respondent.

Before SCALES, HENDON and BOKOR, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Dismissed. Piquet v. Clareway Props. Ltd., 314 So. 3d 423, 427 (Fla. 3d DCA 2020) (quoting Damsky v. Univ. of Miami, 152 So. 3d 789, 792 (Fla. 3d DCA 2014) ) (internal citations omitted) ("[T]he Florida Supreme Court has repeatedly emphasized that [a] finding that the petitioning party has suffered an irreparable harm that cannot be remedied on direct appeal is a condition precedent to invoking a district court's certiorari jurisdiction."); see also Bd. of Trs. of Internal Improvement Tr. Fund v. Am. Educ. Enters., LLC, 99 So. 3d 450, 456 (Fla. 2012) (internal citations and quotations omitted) ("Certiorari jurisdiction does not lie to review every erroneous discovery order, and overbreadth alone is not a basis on which such jurisdiction will be granted.").