Opinion
No. 73326
09-19-2017
ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS
This original petition for a writ of mandamus challenges a district court order denying a motion for judgment on the pleadings and tolling the statute of limitations for certain plaintiffs in a minimum wage matter.
Having considered the petition and supporting documents, we are not persuaded that our extraordinary and discretionary intervention is warranted, as petitioner has an adequate legal remedy available in the form of an appeal from the final judgment. Pan v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 120 Nev. 222, 224, 228, 88 P.3d 840, 841, 844 (2004); Smith v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 107 Nev. 674, 677, 818 P.2d 849, 851 (1991); see also Moore v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 96 Nev. 415, 416-17, 610 P.2d 188, 189 (1980) (declining to issue writ relief when doing so would not resolve the case). Accordingly, we
ORDER the petition DENIED.
/s/_________, J.
Douglas
/s/_________, J.
Gibbons
/s/_________, J.
Pickering cc: Hon. Kenneth C. Cory, District Judge
Rodriguez Law Offices, P.C.
Hutchison & Steffen, LLC
Leon Greenberg Professional Corporation
Hejmanowski & McCrea LLC
Eighth District Court Clerk