Opinion
No. 12-2253
02-25-2013
KATE I. UWASOMBA, Plaintiff - Appellant, and JUDITH UWASOMBA; SARAH UWASOMBA, Plaintiffs, v. CLYDE D. JETT, in individual and official capacity; CENTRAL TRANSPORT INCORPORATED; DOUGLAS A. LINES, PC, attorney; DONALDSON & BLACK INCORPORATION; ARONBERG GOLDGEHN & GARMISA, Defendants - Appellees.
Kate I. Uwasomba, Appellant Pro Se. Cynthia Lee Santoni, WILSON, ELSER, MOSKOWITZ, EDELMAN & DICKER, LLP, McLean, Virginia; Ronald Paul Herbert, HERBERT & SATTERWHITE PC, Richmond, Virginia; Annemarie DiNardo Cleary, Douglas P. Rucker, Jr., SANDS ANDERSON, PC, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.
UNPUBLISHED
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Henry E. Hudson, District Judge. (3:12-cv-00213-HEH) Before AGEE and DAVIS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Kate I. Uwasomba, Appellant Pro Se. Cynthia Lee Santoni, WILSON, ELSER, MOSKOWITZ, EDELMAN & DICKER, LLP, McLean, Virginia; Ronald Paul Herbert, HERBERT & SATTERWHITE PC, Richmond, Virginia; Annemarie DiNardo Cleary, Douglas P. Rucker, Jr., SANDS ANDERSON, PC, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Kate I. Uwasomba appeals the district court's order denying reconsideration of its order denying her Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b) motion for relief from its order dismissing her civil complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we grant Uwasomba leave to proceed in forma pauperis and affirm the district court's order. Uwasomba v. Jett, 3:12-cv-00213-HEW (E.D. Va. Sept. 21, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED