From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. Zaidi

United States District Court, D. New Jersey
Feb 3, 2011
Criminal No. 10-409 (D.N.J. Feb. 3, 2011)

Opinion

Criminal No. 10-409.

February 3, 2011


ORDER


THIS MATTER comes before the Court on Defendant Syed Zaidi's appeal of Magistrate Judge Patty Shwartz's most recent order of detention and request for bail pending sentencing. Zaidi's original bail conditions were set by Magistrate Judge Madeline Arleo on July 13, 2009, and included a $100,000 unsecured bond, home detention, and electronic monitoring. At a second bail hearing on July 20, 2009, Judge Arleo increased Zaidi's unsecured bond to $250,000 after it was determined that he had provided Pretrial Services with a false residential address. At a third bail hearing on July 14, 2010, Judge Shwartz converted the unsecured bond to a bond secured by 10% in cash or property. When Zaidi failed to satisfy this bail condition, Judge Shwartz issued an order for his arrest and subsequently revoked his bail and ordered him detained. This detention order was reiterated by Judge Shwartz at an October 27, 2010 bail hearing and at a January 24, 2011 bail hearing, as Zaidi continued to be unable to satisfy the requirement that he secure his bond with 10% in either cash or property.

In order to be released on bail pending sentencing, Zaidi must show, by clear and convincing evidence, that he is not likely to flee or pose a danger to the community. 18 U.S.C. § 3143(a). When a district court reviews a Magistrate Judge's detention order under 18 U.S.C. § 3145, the district court must exercise de novo review, but need not conduct a de novo evidentiary hearing. United States v. Delker, 757 F.2d 1390, 1395 (3d Cir. 1985); see United States v. Ervin, No. 09-CR-336, 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 85395, at *4 (W.D. Pa. Aug. 19, 2010) (finding that a district court may hold an evidentiary hearing if necessary, but is not required to do so).

Judge Shwartz has repeatedly found that Zaidi remained a flight risk and would not be released without posting security on his bond. At the January 24, 2011 bail hearing, Zaidi requested release on an unsecured bond so he could attend to the health of his mother, who is in Pakistan. The Court agrees with Judge Shwartz's finding that the evidence regarding the health of his mother does not rise to clear and convincing evidence that he is not a flight risk, and therefore he should not be released without properly securing the $250,000 bond.

The Court having considered the submissions of the parties and having reviewed the transcripts of Judge Shwartz's bail hearings; and for the reasons already stated on the record previously by Judge Shwartz; and for good cause appearing,

IT IS on this ___ day of February, 2011, hereby,

ORDERED that Magistrate Judge Patty Shwartz's January 24, 2011 Order that Defendant Syed Zaidi continue in detention is AFFIRMED, and it is FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant Syed Zaidi's request for release on bail pending his sentencing is DENIED.


Summaries of

U.S. v. Zaidi

United States District Court, D. New Jersey
Feb 3, 2011
Criminal No. 10-409 (D.N.J. Feb. 3, 2011)
Case details for

U.S. v. Zaidi

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. SYED ZAIDI and TOQEER HUSSAIN, Defendants

Court:United States District Court, D. New Jersey

Date published: Feb 3, 2011

Citations

Criminal No. 10-409 (D.N.J. Feb. 3, 2011)