From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. Watson-El

United States District Court, W.D. Missouri, Western Division
Jun 22, 2009
Criminal Action No. 04-00181-01-CR-W-NKL (W.D. Mo. Jun. 22, 2009)

Summary

In Watson-El, the restitution Order mistakenly included both the actual loss and intended loss, thereby doubling the amount ostensibly owed by the defendant.

Summary of this case from U.S. v. Smith

Opinion

Criminal Action No. 04-00181-01-CR-W-NKL.

June 22, 2009


ORDER


On May 6, 2009, United States Magistrate Judge Robert E. Larsen issued a Report and Recommendation [Doc. # 204] recommending that this Court enter an order correcting its January 31, 2005 restitution order [Doc. # 130] to modify Defendant's garnishment to $17,035.40.

Defendant Thomas E. Watson-El was found guilty on July 21, 2004, of conspiracy to manufacture and pass counterfeit checks in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 513.371. At his sentencing on January 15, 2005, counsel for the government and counsel for Defendant stipulated that the amount of loss was $34,376.45. Defendant's counsel represented to the Court that the amount was based on actual loss amounts, however, Defendant voiced concern that the amount improperly combined actual losses and intended losses. The Court provided Defendant an opportunity to support his position, but he provided no proof of any loss amounts other than those contained in the presentence investigation report, so judgment was entered ordering garnishment in the amount of $34,376.45. After an unsuccessful appeal to the Eighth Circuit, Defendant filed a pro se motion for modification of garnishment in which he asserted that $17,341.15 of the restitution ordered represented intended (but not actual) losses for counterfeit checks which were not accepted by merchants [Doc. # 191]. He requested a modification of his garnishment to $17,035.40, and on March 25, 2009, the government filed a stipulation agreeing to "modification of the garnishment to the actual loss suffered by the victim entities totaling $17,035.40" [Doc. # 203]. Magistrate Judge Larsen agreed that the restitution order "improperly combined actual with intended losses," and recommended that this Court modify the garnishment to reflect only actual losses.

Pursuant to the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Larsen, to which there has been no timely objection, and after a de novo review of the record, the Court finds that Defendant Thomas E. Watson-El's garnishment should be modified to $17,035.40, as requested by Defendant and stipulated to by the government.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

U.S. v. Watson-El

United States District Court, W.D. Missouri, Western Division
Jun 22, 2009
Criminal Action No. 04-00181-01-CR-W-NKL (W.D. Mo. Jun. 22, 2009)

In Watson-El, the restitution Order mistakenly included both the actual loss and intended loss, thereby doubling the amount ostensibly owed by the defendant.

Summary of this case from U.S. v. Smith
Case details for

U.S. v. Watson-El

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. THOMAS E. WATSON-EL, Defendant

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Missouri, Western Division

Date published: Jun 22, 2009

Citations

Criminal Action No. 04-00181-01-CR-W-NKL (W.D. Mo. Jun. 22, 2009)

Citing Cases

U.S. v. Smith

Other courts have concluded that a sentencing court retains jurisdiction "to entertain petitions to…

Jackson v. Flournoy

However, it is not clear if that authority would provide Jackson with the ability to bring an independent…