From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. VEAD

United States District Court, N.D. Texas, Dallas Division
May 16, 2005
Criminal No. 3:03-CR-422-D (N.D. Tex. May. 16, 2005)

Opinion

Criminal No. 3:03-CR-422-D.

May 16, 2005


ORDER


After making an independent review of the pleadings, files, and records in this case, including the fee applications, and the findings and recommendation of the magistrate judge, the court concludes that the findings and conclusions are correct and are therefore adopted. For the reasons set out in the magistrate judge's April 29, 2005 findings and recommendation, the court certifies that the services rendered by Messrs. Ackerman and Jett were in an extended case and that excess payment is necessary for fair compensation. The court also adopts the recommendation with respect to the services rendered by J. Randall Price, Ph.D., and certifies that his fees were reasonably incurred and necessary to provide fair compensation for services of an unusual character or duration.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

U.S. v. VEAD

United States District Court, N.D. Texas, Dallas Division
May 16, 2005
Criminal No. 3:03-CR-422-D (N.D. Tex. May. 16, 2005)
Case details for

U.S. v. VEAD

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. CAROLYN HARDIN VEAD, et al.…

Court:United States District Court, N.D. Texas, Dallas Division

Date published: May 16, 2005

Citations

Criminal No. 3:03-CR-422-D (N.D. Tex. May. 16, 2005)

Citing Cases

U.S. v. Mukhtaar

Although the Court may use its firsthand knowledge of Mukhtaar's case when determining whether excess…

U.S. v. Melendes-Canacas

Moreover, approval of such an expert and capping his fees in advance of the expert's services at $2,500.00 is…