From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. Valerio

United States District Court, S.D. Texas, Corpus Christi Division
Dec 27, 2005
Civil Action No. C-05-344 (S.D. Tex. Dec. 27, 2005)

Opinion

Civil Action No. C-05-344.

December 27, 2005


MEMORANDUM AND RECOMMENDATION TO GRANT PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR ENTRY OF DEFAULT JUDGMENT


Plaintiff United States of America seeks recovery from defendant for defaulting on a student loan guaranteed by the Department of Education (D.E. 1). Defendant Valerio was served with a copy of the complaint on August 10, 2005 (D.E. 4). To date Valerio has not filed an answer. On December 5, 2005, the Clerk entered default (D.E. 6). Pending is plaintiff's motion for entry of default judgment (D.E. 7). No response was filed. It is respectfully recommended that plaintiff's motion be granted.

Applicable Law

When a party against whom a judgment for affirmative relief is sought has failed to plead or otherwise defend a lawsuit in federal court and that fact is made to appear by affidavit or otherwise, the clerk shall enter the party's default. Fed.R.Civ.P. 55(a). After a defendant has been defaulted for failure to appear, judgment by default shall be entered upon affidavit of the amount due when the plaintiff's claim is for a sum certain or for a sum which can by computation be made certain. Fed.R.Civ.P. 55(b). Default judgment may be entered only if plaintiff certifies defendant is not in the military service. 50 App. U.S.C. § 520(1).

In order for judgment to be entered in favor of the United States, it must prove that (1) defendant executed the note; (2) the United States is the present holder of the note; and (3) the note is in default. FDIC v. McCrary, 977 F.2d 192, 194, n. 5 (5th Cir. 1992); Federal Sav. Loan Ins. Corp. v. Atkinson-Smith Univ. Park Joint Venture, 729 F. Supp. 1130, 1132 (N.D.Tex. 1989). The defendant bears the burden of proof on any defenses. Eckert-Fair Const. Co. v. Capitol Steel Iron Co., 178 F.2d 338 (5th Cir. 1949), cert. denied, 339 U.S. 928, 70 S.Ct. 626 (1950).

The default judgment proof consists of: (1) a copy of the note (D.E. 7, Exhibit B) and (2) copy of the certificate of indebtedness (D.E. 1, Exhibit A). Because the competency of the evidence is not challenged, it may be relied upon for entry of judgment. United States v. Lawrence, 276 F.3d 193, 196 (5th Cir. 2001).

The note and certificate of indebtedness reflect that on or about February 11, 1988, defendant executed a promissory note in the total principal amount of $2,300.00 payable to First American Savings, FSB Longmont, CO (D.E. 1, Exhibit A; D.E. 7, Exhibit B). The interest rate for repayment was set at 8% per annum (D.E. 1, Exhibit A). The note was guaranteed under a loan guaranty program authorized under Title IV-B of the Higher Education Act of 1965, as amended, 20 U.S.C. §§ 1071 et seq. ( 34 C.F.R. Part 682) (D.E. 1, Exh. A). Defendant defaulted on the note on April 7, 1989 ( Id.). After application of all credits, a loan analyst with the United States Department of Education calculated that as of May 15, 1997, the principal balance owed was $1,045.95, plus interest of $651.83, plus administrative costs of $19.49 ( Id.). Interest accrues on the principal balance at the rate of $.23 per day from May 15, 1997 ( Id.).

The United States has demonstrated that the defendant executed the note, that the United States is the current holder of the note, and that the note is in default. The United States has also submitted an affidavit that defendant is not currently in the military service of the United States (D.E. 7, Attached Nonmilitary Declaration). The United States is entitled to entry of default judgment.

Attorney's Fees

Plaintiff's motion for default judgment seeks $550.00 in attorney's fees (D.E. 7, Aff. of M.H. Cersonsky). The United States is entitled to reasonable attorney's fees as a prevailing party in litigation brought by it. 28 U.S.C. § 2412(b).

In this circuit, attorney fees are determined by first multiplying the reasonable hourly fee by the number of hours reasonably expended to arrive at a "lodestar" fee. Migis v. Pearle Vision, Inc., 135 F.3d 1041, 1047 (5th Cir. 1998) (Title VII); Mid-Continent Casualty Co. v. Chevron Pipe Line Co., 205 F.3d 222, 231 (5th Cir. 2000) (breach of contract). Then the court considers whether the lodestar figure should be adjusted upward or downward depending upon the circumstances of the case. Migis, 135 F.3d at 1047. In making the adjustment the court looks to the twelve Johnson factors:

(1) the time and labor required for the litigation; (2) the novelty and difficulty of the questions presented; (3) the skill required to perform the legal services properly; (4) the preclusion of other employment by the attorney due to acceptance of the case; (5) the customary fee; (6) whether the fee is fixed or contingent; (7) time limitations imposed by the client or the circumstances; (8) the amount involved and the result obtained; (9) the experience, reputation and ability of the attorneys; (10) the "undesirability" of the case; (11) the nature and length of the professional relationship with the client; and (12) awards in similar cases.
Id. (citing Johnson v. Georgia Highway Express, Inc., 488 F.2d 714 (5th Cir. 1974)).

Counsel did not set forth the amount of time spent on the case and did not propose a reasonable hourly fee (D.E. 7, Aff. M.H. Cersonsky). A fee of $550.00 is the standard fee assessed by this court in similar cases. The $550.00 fee is reasonable, and is recommended.

Costs

Plaintiff also seeks reimbursement for costs of $95.00, which include a $77.00 service fee and $18.00 Judgment Recording fee. (D.E. 7, Aff. of M.H. Cersonsky). The United States is entitled to costs of suit. 28 U.S.C. §§ 1920, 2412. Counsel also seeks the $250 filing fee ( Id.). The filing fee is properly taxed as a cost of suit. 28 U.S.C. § 2412(a)(2).

RECOMMENDATION

It is respectfully recommended that plaintiff's motion for entry of default judgment (D.E. 7) be granted and that judgment in favor of the United States of America be entered in the following amounts:

1. Note:

2. Attorneys Fees and Costs

Principal Balance ................................ $1,045.95 Interest ......................................... $ 651.83 Administrative Costs ............................. $ 19.49 _________ $1,717.27
Plus prejudgment interest at $.23 per day from May 15, 1997 to date of judgment; plus
Attorney's Fees .................................. $ 550.00 Filing Fee ....................................... $ 250.00 Service Fee ...................................... $ 77.00 Judgment Recording Fee ........................... $ 18.00 ________ 895.00 plus
3. Post judgment interest at the prevailing rate.


Summaries of

U.S. v. Valerio

United States District Court, S.D. Texas, Corpus Christi Division
Dec 27, 2005
Civil Action No. C-05-344 (S.D. Tex. Dec. 27, 2005)
Case details for

U.S. v. Valerio

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. UVALDO VALERIO, Defendant

Court:United States District Court, S.D. Texas, Corpus Christi Division

Date published: Dec 27, 2005

Citations

Civil Action No. C-05-344 (S.D. Tex. Dec. 27, 2005)