From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. Thompson

United States District Court, E.D. Virginia, Richmond Division
Jul 16, 2007
CASE NO. 3:07CR136 (E.D. Va. Jul. 16, 2007)

Opinion

CASE NO. 3:07CR136.

July 16, 2007


ORDER


This matter is before the court for consideration of a report and recommendation by the Magistrate Judge regarding the Magistrate Judge's acceptance of the Defendant's plea of guilty to specified charges in the pending matter pursuant to a Fed.R.Crim.P. 11 proceeding conducted by the Magistrate Judge with the consent of the Defendant and counsel. It appearing that the Magistrate Judge made full inquiry and findings pursuant to Rule 11; that the Defendant was given notice of the right to file specific objections to the report and recommendation that has been submitted as a result of the proceeding; and it further appearing that no objection has been asserted within the prescribed time period, it is hereby

ORDERED that the report and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED and the Defendant is found guilty of Counts One and Four of the Indictment.


Summaries of

U.S. v. Thompson

United States District Court, E.D. Virginia, Richmond Division
Jul 16, 2007
CASE NO. 3:07CR136 (E.D. Va. Jul. 16, 2007)
Case details for

U.S. v. Thompson

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. HOLCOMB THOMPSON, Defendant

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Virginia, Richmond Division

Date published: Jul 16, 2007

Citations

CASE NO. 3:07CR136 (E.D. Va. Jul. 16, 2007)

Citing Cases

PEOPLES SAV. LOAN ASSN. v. CRAM

Appellant contends that the respondents Batinovich rendered themselves personally liable for the mortgage…

Hulin v. Veatch

To like effect see Crebbin v. Shinn, 19 Colo. App. 302 ( 74 P. 795). From Holcomb v. Thompson, 50 Kan. 598 (…