From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. Stock

United States District Court, E.D. Tennessee, at Greeneville
Sep 2, 2009
NO. 2:09-CR-46 (E.D. Tenn. Sep. 2, 2009)

Opinion

NO. 2:09-CR-46.

September 2, 2009


ORDER


This criminal matter is before the Court to consider the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge dated August 4, 2009. [Doc. 30]. The Magistrate Judge recommends that the defendant's motion to dismiss the indictment be denied. [Doc. 19]. The defendant has filed objections to this report. [Doc. 39].

After careful and de novo consideration of the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge, the defendant's motion to dismiss, the response of the government, and for the reasons set out in that Report and Recommendation, which are incorporated by reference herein, it is hereby ORDERED that this Report and Recommendation is ADOPTED and APPROVED, and that the defendant's motion to dismiss is DENIED.

[Doc. 19].

In addition, it should also be noted that the defendant's issue in regard to a due process violation based on lack of notice and his ex post facto argument are effectively foreclosed by United States v. Samuels, 319 Fed. Appx. 389, 2009 WL 877698 (6th Cir. 2009).


Summaries of

U.S. v. Stock

United States District Court, E.D. Tennessee, at Greeneville
Sep 2, 2009
NO. 2:09-CR-46 (E.D. Tenn. Sep. 2, 2009)
Case details for

U.S. v. Stock

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. JEFFREY STOCK

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Tennessee, at Greeneville

Date published: Sep 2, 2009

Citations

NO. 2:09-CR-46 (E.D. Tenn. Sep. 2, 2009)

Citing Cases

U.S. v. Coleman

Seven district courts in the Sixth Circuit have upheld SORNA. See United States v. Stock, No. 2:09-CR-46,…

U.S. v. Alvarado-Aceves

Id. The Fourth Circuit accordingly concluded that the Attorney General had good cause to dispense with APA…