From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. Salgado

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Jul 22, 1999
189 F.3d 476 (9th Cir. 1999)

Opinion


189 F.3d 476 (9th Cir. 1999) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Eleazar Bustos SALGADO, Defendant-Appellant. No. 96-36240. Nos. CV-96-00289-FVS, CR-92-00273-1-FVS United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit July 22, 1999

Submitted January 7, 1999.

The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Editorial Note:

This opinion appears in the Federal reporter in a table titled "Table of Decisions Without Reported Opinions". (See FI CTA9 Rule 36-3 regarding use of unpublished opinions)

Submission Withdrawn Jan. 11, 1999.

Resubmitted July 19, 1999.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Washington, Fred L. Van Sickle, District Judge, Presiding.

Before CANBY and GRABER, Circuit Judges, and BREWSTER, Senior District Judge.

The Honorable Rudi M. Brewster, Senior United States District Judge for the Southern District of California, sitting by designation.

MEMORANDUM

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The district court's order entered on October 10, 1996, is vacated, and the matter is remanded to the district court for reconsideration in the light of United States v. Barron, No. 96-36058, slip op. at 3487 (9th Cir. April 16, 1999) (en banc).

VACATED and REMANDED.


Summaries of

U.S. v. Salgado

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Jul 22, 1999
189 F.3d 476 (9th Cir. 1999)
Case details for

U.S. v. Salgado

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Eleazar Bustos SALGADO…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Jul 22, 1999

Citations

189 F.3d 476 (9th Cir. 1999)

Citing Cases

Stallings v. Cruz

See Durham v. New Jersey Dep't of Corr., No. CIV. A.09-4314PGS, 2010 WL 1379783, at *11 (D.N.J. Mar. 29,…

Song v. Kent

As such, the Court is not going beyond that which the Attorney General can do. Accord Wiedersperg v. I.N.S.,…