From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. Robinson

United States District Court, E.D. Texas
Aug 10, 2006
Case No. 1:03-CR-241 (E.D. Tex. Aug. 10, 2006)

Opinion

Case No. 1:03-CR-241.

August 10, 2006


MEMORANDUM ORDER OVERRULING DEFENDANT'S OBJECTIONS AND ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION


Defendant Charles Edward Robinson, Jr., a federal prisoner, proceeding pro se, brought this Motion to Correct Sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582 (#21).

The court referred this matter to the Honorable Keith F. Giblin, United States Magistrate Judge, at Beaumont, Texas, for consideration pursuant to applicable laws and orders of this court. The magistrate judge recommends this motion be denied.

The court has received and considered the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge filed pursuant to such referral, along with the record, pleadings and all available evidence. Defendant filed objections to the magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation. This requires a de novo review of the objections in relation to the pleadings and applicable law. See FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b). After careful consideration, the court concludes Defendant's objections are without merit.

ORDER

Accordingly, Defendant's objections are OVERRULED. The findings of fact and conclusion of law of the magistrate judge are correct, and the report of the magistrate judge is ADOPTED. It is, therefore, ORDERED that Defendant's Motion to Correct Sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582 is DENIED.


Summaries of

U.S. v. Robinson

United States District Court, E.D. Texas
Aug 10, 2006
Case No. 1:03-CR-241 (E.D. Tex. Aug. 10, 2006)
Case details for

U.S. v. Robinson

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. CHARLES EDWARD ROBINSON, JR

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Texas

Date published: Aug 10, 2006

Citations

Case No. 1:03-CR-241 (E.D. Tex. Aug. 10, 2006)

Citing Cases

U.S. v. Williams

It does not appear that a certificate of appealability is required under the circumstances in this case where…

U.S. v. Thercy

It does not appear that a certificate of appealability is required under the circumstances in this case where…