U.S. v. Riley

Full title: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee and Cross-Appellant v. TAMIKA RILEY AND…

Court: United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit

Date published: Oct 27, 2010

Nos. 08-3361, 08-3413, 08-3758, and 08-3759 (3d Cir. Oct. 27, 2010)

Opinion

Nos. 08-3361, 08-3413, 08-3758, and 08-3759.

Argued April 13, 2010.

Dated: October 27, 2010.

On Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey; (D.C. No. 2-07-cr-00578), District Judge: Honorable William J. Martini.

Before: SLOVITER and NYGAARD, Circuit Judges, and RESTANI,^_ Judge.

_ Honorable Jane A. Restani, Chief Judge of the United States Court of International Trade, sitting by designation.

ORDER AMENDING OCTOBER 21, 2010 ORDER AMENDING OPINION

JANE A. RESTANI, Judge.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the order amending opinion in the above case, filed October 21, 2010, be amended as follows:

Page 15, first sentence of the first full paragraph which read:

While it is true that the jury convicted James of a substantive violation referred to in one of the alternative descriptions of duty, 18 U.S.C. § 666 (Count 4), dependents have met their burden of showing a reasonable probability that the jury utilized the broad definition of an honest services violation given in connection with the entire conspiracy charge.

shall read:

While it is true that the jury convicted James of a substantive violation referred to in one of the alternative descriptions of duty, 18 U.S.C. § 666 (Count 4), defendants have met their burden of showing a reasonable probability that the jury utilized the broad definition of an honest services violation given in connection with the entire conspiracy charge.