From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. Rhoades

United States District Court, N.D. Georgia, Atlanta Division
Aug 25, 2008
CRIMINAL FILE NO. 1:08-CR-56-TWT (N.D. Ga. Aug. 25, 2008)

Opinion

CRIMINAL FILE NO. 1:08-CR-56-TWT.

August 25, 2008


ORDER


This is a criminal action. It is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation [Doc. 38] of the Magistrate Judge recommending denying the Defendant's Motion to Suppress Evidence [Doc. 22] and Motion to Suppress Statements [Doc. 23]. The Defendant was properly advised of his Miranda rights and freely and voluntarily made incriminatory statements. The FBI agents were not required to advise him of his rights every time that they talked to him or to advise him of every criminal offense being investigated. The initial search of the DVD was authorized by the first search warrant. The Court approves and adopts the Report and Recommendation as the judgment of the Court. The Defendant's Motion to Suppress Evidence [Doc. 22] and Motion to Suppress Statements [Doc. 23] are DENIED.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

U.S. v. Rhoades

United States District Court, N.D. Georgia, Atlanta Division
Aug 25, 2008
CRIMINAL FILE NO. 1:08-CR-56-TWT (N.D. Ga. Aug. 25, 2008)
Case details for

U.S. v. Rhoades

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. DOUGLAS YUTAKA RHOADES, Defendant

Court:United States District Court, N.D. Georgia, Atlanta Division

Date published: Aug 25, 2008

Citations

CRIMINAL FILE NO. 1:08-CR-56-TWT (N.D. Ga. Aug. 25, 2008)

Citing Cases

United States v. Hendley

Id. Judge Thrash in this District confronted a similar question in United States v. Rhoades, No.…