From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. Real Property in Brown County

United States District Court, S.D. Indiana
Feb 22, 2006
1:05-cv-1373-DFH-TAB (S.D. Ind. Feb. 22, 2006)

Opinion

1:05-cv-1373-DFH-TAB.

February 22, 2006


ENTRY CONCERNING SELECTED MATTERS


The court, having considered the above action and the matters which are pending, makes the following rulings:

1. Mr. Pedigo's motion to set replevin hearing is denied based on the present record.

2. Mr. Pedigo has asserted an interest in the seized property, but not an assertion sufficient to satisfy the pleading requirement in this case. To contest a forfeiture action under Supplemental Rule C(6), an individual bears the burden of demonstrating an interest in the seized item sufficient to satisfy the court of his standing. United States v. $47,875 in United States Currency, 746 F.2d 291, 293 (5th Cir. 1984). Specifically, Rule C(6) requires that a putative claimant file a verified claim under oath or affirmation and include "the claimant's interest in the property, the right by which [the claimant] demands restitution, and the right by which [the claimant] defends the action." United States v. $38,570 in United States Currency, 950 F.2d 1108, 1111 (5th Cir. 1992) (quoting FED. R. CIV. P. SUPP. R. C(6)); see also United States v. Prop. Identified as $88,260.00 in United States Currency, 925 F.Supp. 838, 840-41 (D.D.C. 1996) (noting that the claimant must file a verified claim in an in rem forfeiture action to acquire statutory standing); United States v. A Single Story Double Wide Trailer, 727 F.Supp. 149, 152-53 (D.Del. 1989) (stating that "[o]nly by filing a verified claim, in accordance with C(6), can a claimant demonstrate that he has a sufficient interest in the seized item to satisfy standing requirements"); United States v. $288,914.00 in United States Currency, 722 F.Supp. 267, 270 (E.D.La. 1989) (recognizing that a claimant must comply with the pleading requirements of Supplemental Rule C(6)).

3. The United States' motion for order to show cause is granted. Mr. Pedigo shall have through March 28, 2006, in which to file a claim to the seized property which complies with the requirements described in paragraph 2 of this Entry. Specifically, he shall have through that date in which to file a verified claim under oath or affirmation and include his interest in the property, the right by which he demands restitution, and the right by which he defends the action.

So ordered.


Summaries of

U.S. v. Real Property in Brown County

United States District Court, S.D. Indiana
Feb 22, 2006
1:05-cv-1373-DFH-TAB (S.D. Ind. Feb. 22, 2006)
Case details for

U.S. v. Real Property in Brown County

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. REAL PROPERTY IN BROWN COUNTY…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. Indiana

Date published: Feb 22, 2006

Citations

1:05-cv-1373-DFH-TAB (S.D. Ind. Feb. 22, 2006)