Opinion
No. CR-06-513-PHX-ROS (LOA).
June 8, 2011
ORDER
On May 16, 2011, United States Magistrate Judge Anderson issued a Report and Recommendation. (Doc. 64). Plaintiff has not objected to the Report and Recommendation.
A district judge "may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations made by the magistrate judge." 28 U.S.C. § 636(b). Where any party has filed timely objections to the magistrate judge's report and recommendations, the district court's review of the part objected to is to be de novo. Id.; see also United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003); Schmidt v. Johnstone, 263 F. Supp. 2d 1219, 1226 (D. Ariz. 2003) ("Following Reyna-Tapia, this Court concludes that de novo review of factual and legal issues is required if objections are made, but not otherwise.") (internal quotations and citations omitted).
No objections being made, the Court will adopt the Report and Recommendation in full.
Accordingly,
IT IS ORDERED the Report and Recommendation (Doc. 64) is ADOPTED. IT IS ORDERED the Government's Application for Writ of Garnishment directed to the Gila River Indian Community, seeking continuing garnishment of Pedro's interest in the quarterly per capita payments from the Gila River Indian Community Revenue Allocation Ordinance GR-07-09 (Doc. 53) is GRANTED. IT IS ORDERED Pedro's Motion for Garnishment Hearing (Doc. 63) is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED the Clerk of Court is kindly directed to mail a copy of this Order to Melvin Coleman Pedro, # 46030-008, Lewisburg, PA, Lewisburg-USP, R.D. # 5, U.S. Penitentiary, P.O. Box 1000, Lewisburg, PA, 17837.