From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. Odiodio

United States District Court, N.D. Texas, Dallas Division
Nov 7, 2005
Nos. 3:99-CR-0236-D (02), 3:03-CV-0896-D (N.D. Tex. Nov. 7, 2005)

Opinion

Nos. 3:99-CR-0236-D (02), 3:03-CV-0896-D.

November 7, 2005


ORDER


After reviewing all relevant matters of record in this case, including the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge, in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), the undersigned District Judge is of the opinion that the Findings and Conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct and they are accepted as the Findings and Conclusions of the Court.

The Magistrate Judge filed her Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation on August 24, 2005. Because movant is shown on the docket sheet to reside in Lagos Nigeria, the court has waited until now to act on the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation. Because suffcient time has elapsed for movant to receive the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation and file objections, the court, following de novo review, is adopting the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation today.

For the reasons stated in the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation, the Court DENIES movant's motions for discovery and to vacate mandate that are contained within the attachments to his motion to vacate filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255. By judgment filed today, movant's § 2255 motion is denied.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

U.S. v. Odiodio

United States District Court, N.D. Texas, Dallas Division
Nov 7, 2005
Nos. 3:99-CR-0236-D (02), 3:03-CV-0896-D (N.D. Tex. Nov. 7, 2005)
Case details for

U.S. v. Odiodio

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent/Plaintiff, v. BONIFACE SULEMAN…

Court:United States District Court, N.D. Texas, Dallas Division

Date published: Nov 7, 2005

Citations

Nos. 3:99-CR-0236-D (02), 3:03-CV-0896-D (N.D. Tex. Nov. 7, 2005)

Citing Cases

United States v. Tucker

Rec. Doc. No. 70. United States v. Odiodio, 2005 WL 2990906 at *14 (N.D. Tex. Nov. 7, 2005)(quoting United…

[REDACTED] v. United States

A bare allegation of a potential conflict of interest because a federal public defender is an employee of the…