From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. Nururdin

United States District Court, D. Minnesota
Nov 3, 2006
No. 06-CR-148(06) (JMR/RLE) (D. Minn. Nov. 3, 2006)

Opinion

No. 06-CR-148(06) (JMR/RLE).

November 3, 2006


ORDER


Defendant objects to the Report and Recommendation issued August 24, 2006 [Docket No. 154], by the Honorable Raymond L. Erickson, United States Magistrate Judge. The Report recommended denying defendant's motions to suppress evidence obtained from search and seizure, and to suppress eyewitness identification. Defendant's objections to the Report were timely filed, pursuant to Local Rule 72.1(c)(2).

Based upon a de novo review of the record herein, the Court adopts the Magistrate's Report and Recommendation.

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that:

1. Defendant's Motion to Suppress Evidence Obtained from Search and Seizure [Docket No. 77] is denied.

2. Defendant's Motion to Suppress Eyewitness Identification [No. 79] is denied.


Summaries of

U.S. v. Nururdin

United States District Court, D. Minnesota
Nov 3, 2006
No. 06-CR-148(06) (JMR/RLE) (D. Minn. Nov. 3, 2006)
Case details for

U.S. v. Nururdin

Case Details

Full title:United States of America v. Seth Tylibe Nururdin

Court:United States District Court, D. Minnesota

Date published: Nov 3, 2006

Citations

No. 06-CR-148(06) (JMR/RLE) (D. Minn. Nov. 3, 2006)

Citing Cases

U.S. v. Vann

Accordingly, because there is nothing to demonstrate that the challenged identification procedures were…