From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. Mehilove

United States District Court, D. Minnesota
Oct 12, 2011
Criminal No. 11-219 (RHK/SER) (D. Minn. Oct. 12, 2011)

Opinion

Criminal No. 11-219 (RHK/SER).

October 12, 2011


ORDER


Having reviewed de novo the September 29, 2011 Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Steven E. Rau, and Defendant's Objections thereto, and upon all of the files, records and proceedings herein, IT IS ORDERED:

The Court has also reviewed the 27-page transcript of the August 25, 2011 Motions Hearing before Judge Rau.

1. Defendant's Objections (Doc. No. 39) are OVERRULED;

The Objections assert, in their entirety, that "Mr. Mehilove respectfully objects to the findings contained in the Magistrate's Report and Recommendation issued on September 15, 2011." There is no Memorandum accompanying the Objections.

2. The Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 36) is ADOPTED;

3. Defendant's Motion to Suppress Evidence Obtained as a Result of Search and Seizure (Doc. No. 21) is DENIED; and

4. Defendant's Motion to Suppress Statements, Admissions, and Answers (Doc. No. 22) is DENIED.


Summaries of

U.S. v. Mehilove

United States District Court, D. Minnesota
Oct 12, 2011
Criminal No. 11-219 (RHK/SER) (D. Minn. Oct. 12, 2011)
Case details for

U.S. v. Mehilove

Case Details

Full title:United States of America, Plaintiff, v. Andre George Mehilove, Defendant

Court:United States District Court, D. Minnesota

Date published: Oct 12, 2011

Citations

Criminal No. 11-219 (RHK/SER) (D. Minn. Oct. 12, 2011)

Citing Cases

United States v. Charles

The affidavit reiterated that Det. Schantzen sought authority to conduct forensic examinations of any…