From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. McKeighan

United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit
Sep 25, 2007
243 F. App'x 447 (10th Cir. 2007)

Opinion

No. 07-3192.

September 25, 2007.

Terra D. Morehead, Office of the United States Attorney, Kansas City, KS, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Phillip R. Gibson, Thomason Gibson LLC, Independance, MO, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before HENRY, O'BRIEN, and GORSUCH, Circuit Judges.


ORDER AND JUDGMENT

This panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of this appeal. See Fed.R.App.P. 34(a)(2); 10th Cir. R. 34.1(G). The case is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument. This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. It may be cited, however, for its persuasive value consistent with Fed.R.App.P. 32.1 and 10th Cir. R. 32.1.


Defendant James McKeighan seeks to appeal adverse rulings of the magistrate judge on his motions to reconsider the imposition of pretrial detention or, alternatively, to modify the conditions of his pretrial detention. By order entered August 28, 2007, we directed defendant to show cause why this appeal should not be dismissed for lack of appellate jurisdiction because the rulings he seeks to appeal are not final and appealable orders. See 18 U.S.C. § 3145(c) (providing that appeal from decision denying revocation or amendment of detention order is governed by 28 U.S.C. § 1291); United States v. Harrison, 396 F.3d 1280, 1281 (2d Cir. 2005) (per curiam) (dismissing appeal from magistrate judge's detention order for lack of jurisdiction). Neither defendant nor his counsel has responded to the order to show cause.

We conclude that we lack jurisdiction over this appeal and it must be dismissed. Defendant's counsel has filed a motion to withdraw. As a preliminary matter, we appoint him for these proceedings under the Criminal Justice Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3006A, and direct the Clerk to forward to him the necessary voucher materials. Because we are dismissing this appeal, however, counsel's pending motion to withdraw is DENIED as moot. The appeal is DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction.


Summaries of

U.S. v. McKeighan

United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit
Sep 25, 2007
243 F. App'x 447 (10th Cir. 2007)
Case details for

U.S. v. McKeighan

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. James A. McKEIGHAN…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit

Date published: Sep 25, 2007

Citations

243 F. App'x 447 (10th Cir. 2007)

Citing Cases

United States v. Lundahl

Upon consideration of Mr. Harris's motion to withdraw, the district court docket, and the applicable law, the…