Opinion
No. 06-50038.
Argued and Submitted December 6, 2006.
Filed December 21, 2006.
Becky S. Walker, Esq., Jennifer Corbett, Esq., Office of the U.S. Attorney Criminal Division, Los Angeles, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Michael Tanaka, Esq., Federal Public Defender's Office, Los Angeles, CA, for Defendant-Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California, Percy Anderson, District Judge, Presiding. D.C. No. CR-05-00845-PA.
Before: REINHARDT, KOZINSKI and IKUTA, Circuit Judges.
MEMORANDUM
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Conduct is relevant under U.S.S.G. § 1B1.3(a)(1) when it temporally "occurred during the commission of the offense of conviction." United States v. Johnson, 187 F.3d 1129, 1133-34 (9th Cir. 1999). The crime of illegal entry is a continuing offense that commences with entry and is not completed until discovery. See United States v. Reyes-Pacheco, 248 F.3d 942, 946 (9th Cir. 2001). Because defendant was convicted of firearm possession after entry but before discovery, the firearm conviction is relevant conduct under the reasoning of Johnson. The district court thus erred in counting the felony firearm offense as a prior sentence under U.S.S.G. §§ 4A1.1, 4A1.2(a)(1) n. 1.
As defendant concedes, his argument that Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998), should be overruled is foreclosed by United States v. Weiland, 420 F.3d 1062, 1079 n. 16 (9th Cir. 2005).
REVERSED and REMANDED for re-sentencing.