From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. Johnson

United States District Court, E.D. Missouri, Eastern Division
Jun 9, 2006
Case No. 4:06CR108 HEA (E.D. Mo. Jun. 9, 2006)

Opinion

Case No. 4:06CR108 HEA.

June 9, 2006


OPINION, MEMORANDUM AND ORDER


This matter is before the Court on Defendant Jose Johnson's Motion to Suppress Evidence and Statements [#19] and Motion for Discovery of Identity of Confidential Informant [#20]. The Court referred this matter to United States Magistrate Judge Frederick R. Buckles for a report and recommendation pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b). An evidentiary hearing was held on April 20, 2006 before Judge Buckles, wherein testimony and evidence was adduced. On May 26, 2006, Judge Buckles filed his report, recommending that both of Defendant's motions be denied. To date, no objections to the report and recommendation have been filed.

After careful consideration, the Court will adopt and sustain the sound reasoning of Judge Buckles as set forth in his report and recommendation.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant Jose Johnson's Motion to Suppress Evidence and Statements [#19] is denied;

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant's Motion for Discovery of Identity of Confidential Informant [#20] is denied.


Summaries of

U.S. v. Johnson

United States District Court, E.D. Missouri, Eastern Division
Jun 9, 2006
Case No. 4:06CR108 HEA (E.D. Mo. Jun. 9, 2006)
Case details for

U.S. v. Johnson

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. JOSE JOHNSON, Defendant

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Missouri, Eastern Division

Date published: Jun 9, 2006

Citations

Case No. 4:06CR108 HEA (E.D. Mo. Jun. 9, 2006)

Citing Cases

United States v. Dalmau

We got money.' This statement was totally unresponsive to Seals' question. It was not improperly compelled by…

United States v. Dalmau

We got money.' •This statement was totally unresponsive to Seals' question. It was not improperly compelled…