From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. Johnson

United States District Court, E.D. Arkansas, Western Division
Jul 6, 2009
No. 4:95CR00062 SWW (E.D. Ark. Jul. 6, 2009)

Opinion

No. 4:95CR00062 SWW.

July 6, 2009


ORDER


Before the Court is defendant's pro se motion to expunge his criminal conviction to which the government responded. Defendant asserts that on the basis of his post-conviction conduct, notably his substantial and successful rehabilitative efforts, he deserves to have his conviction expunged.

In United States v. Meyer, 439 F.3d 855 (8th Cir. 2006), the Eighth Circuit held that district courts do not have ancillary jurisdiction to expunge a criminal record based solely on equitable grounds. Defendant does not assert any grounds authorizing this Court to expunge his criminal conviction. Therefore, his motion [docket entry 52] is denied.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

U.S. v. Johnson

United States District Court, E.D. Arkansas, Western Division
Jul 6, 2009
No. 4:95CR00062 SWW (E.D. Ark. Jul. 6, 2009)
Case details for

U.S. v. Johnson

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. MARK ALLEN JOHNSON

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Arkansas, Western Division

Date published: Jul 6, 2009

Citations

No. 4:95CR00062 SWW (E.D. Ark. Jul. 6, 2009)

Citing Cases

U.S. v. Smith

See United States v. Lucido, 612 F.3d 871 (6th Cir. 2010); United States v. Coloian, 480 F.3d 47, 52 (1st…