From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. Hunter

United States District Court, E.D. Tennessee, at Winchester
Sep 28, 2009
No. 4:09-cr-19 (E.D. Tenn. Sep. 28, 2009)

Summary

finding a statement voluntarily provided even considering Defendant may have incurred a head injury or used drugs prior to the interview where Defendant had rationally explained his decision to commit the crime

Summary of this case from United States v. Michaeloski

Opinion

No. 4:09-cr-19.

September 28, 2009


ORDER


United States Magistrate Judge Susan K. Lee filed her report and recommendation pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 59(a). [Court Doc. 29.] Neither party filed objections within the given 10 days.

After reviewing the record, the Court agrees with Magistrate Judge Lee's report and recommendation. The Court thus ACCEPTS and ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Lee's findings of fact, conclusions of law, and recommendations pursuant to § 636(b)(1) and Rule 59(a).

Accordingly, the Court ORDERS that the Motion to Suppress and Memorandum [Court Doc. 19] is DENIED.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

U.S. v. Hunter

United States District Court, E.D. Tennessee, at Winchester
Sep 28, 2009
No. 4:09-cr-19 (E.D. Tenn. Sep. 28, 2009)

finding a statement voluntarily provided even considering Defendant may have incurred a head injury or used drugs prior to the interview where Defendant had rationally explained his decision to commit the crime

Summary of this case from United States v. Michaeloski
Case details for

U.S. v. Hunter

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. HOWARD C. HUNTER

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Tennessee, at Winchester

Date published: Sep 28, 2009

Citations

No. 4:09-cr-19 (E.D. Tenn. Sep. 28, 2009)

Citing Cases

United States v. Michaeloski

Defendant's meticulous focus on the written statement's accuracy demonstrates both his cognitive ability at…