From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. Hinestrosa

United States District Court, S.D. Florida
Sep 7, 2010
CASE NO.: 99-CR-501-PCH (S.D. Fla. Sep. 7, 2010)

Opinion

CASE NO.: 99-CR-501-PCH.

September 7, 2010


ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION


THIS MATTER is before the Court on Magistrate Judge Chris McAliley's Report and Recommendation (D.E. #107) regarding the Plaintiff's Motion for Reconsideration of Order Requiring the Return of Forfeited Currency (D.E. #56), Defendant's Motion to Expunge Record (D.E. #57) and Motion for Attorney's Fees (D.E. #63). Judge McAliley recommends that the Court grant the Plaintiff's Motion for Reconsideration, and deny Defendant's Motion to Expunge Record and Motion for Attorney Fees. The Court has independently reviewed the Report and Recommendation, the Motions, and the record. After that review, and having received no objections to Judge McAliley's Report and Recommendation, the Court concludes that the Report and Recommendation is affirmed and hereby adopted as the Court's order. Accordingly, the Plaintiff's Motion for Reconsideration of Order Requiring the Returned of Forfeited Currency is granted, and Defendant's Motion for Expunge Record and Motion for Attorneys' Fees are denied.

DONE and ORDERED in Chambers, Miami, Florida, September 07, 2010.


Summaries of

U.S. v. Hinestrosa

United States District Court, S.D. Florida
Sep 7, 2010
CASE NO.: 99-CR-501-PCH (S.D. Fla. Sep. 7, 2010)
Case details for

U.S. v. Hinestrosa

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. ELSA C. HINESTROSA, Defendant

Court:United States District Court, S.D. Florida

Date published: Sep 7, 2010

Citations

CASE NO.: 99-CR-501-PCH (S.D. Fla. Sep. 7, 2010)

Citing Cases

United States v. Mickle

Ms. Mickle was convicted after a guilty plea, and the integrity of this conviction has not been challenged.…