From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. Henriques

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Dec 17, 2009
356 F. App'x 664 (4th Cir. 2009)

Opinion

No. 09-7184.

Submitted: December 15, 2009.

Decided: December 17, 2009.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Martin K. Reidinger, District Judge. (3:93-cr-00089-MR-2).

Phillip Henriques, Appellant Pro Se. Amy Elizabeth Ray, Assistant United States Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Before MICHAEL and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


Phillip Henriques appeals the district court's order denying his motion for a sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006) based on Amendment 591. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Henriques, No. 3:93-cr-00089-MR-2, 2009 WL 1606444

(W.D.N.C. June 5, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

U.S. v. Henriques

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Dec 17, 2009
356 F. App'x 664 (4th Cir. 2009)
Case details for

U.S. v. Henriques

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Phillip HENRIQUES…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

Date published: Dec 17, 2009

Citations

356 F. App'x 664 (4th Cir. 2009)

Citing Cases

Henriques v. Hollingsworth

Petitioner's appeal of the district court's denial was denied on December 17, 2009. See Untied States v.…