Summary
holding that restitution debtor challenging the government's ability to collect the debt through offset must present those arguments "to the Department of Justice, not to the court"
Summary of this case from Simmons v. MischelOpinion
Criminal No. 3:94-CR-428-D.
August 16, 2007
ORDER
After conducting a review of the relevant pleadings, files, and records in this case, the June 11, 2007 findings and recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge, defendant's July 12, 2007 objections, and plaintiff's July 25, 2007 response in opposition to defendant's objections, in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), the court concludes that the findings and recommendation of the magistrate judge are correct, and they are hereby accepted as the findings of the court.
The recommendation contains a typographical error (a reference to a $405,164.39 restitution balance) that is immaterial to the court's decision and can be disregarded.
Accordingly, defendant's January 4, 2007 motion to amend the restitution order [Doc. #869] is denied.