U.S. v. Harris

Full title: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Daniel Lee HARRIS…

Court: United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit

Date published: Feb 18, 2009

310 F. App'x 716 (5th Cir. 2009)

Opinion

No. 06-11067 Conference Calendar.

February 18, 2009.

Paul David Macaluso, U.S. Attorney's Office, Northern District of Texas, Dallas, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Daniel Lee Harris, Seagoville, TX, pro se.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas, USDC No. 7:05-CR-26-ALL.

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DENNIS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:[fn*] [fn*] Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

The attorney appointed to represent Daniel Lee Harris has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Harris's outstanding pro se motions are DENIED. Our independent review of the record and counsel's brief discloses no non-frivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel's motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.