From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. Graham

United States District Court, D. Minnesota
Apr 20, 2009
Criminal No. 08-251 (JNE/JJG) (D. Minn. Apr. 20, 2009)

Opinion

Criminal No. 08-251 (JNE/JJG).

April 20, 2009


ORDER


This case is before the Court on a Report and Recommendation issued by the Honorable Jeanne J. Graham, United States Magistrate Judge, on March 12, 2009. The magistrate judge recommended that Defendant's motion to suppress evidence be granted as to information relating solely to American General and denied in all other respects. The magistrate judge also recommended that Defendant's motion to suppress statements be denied as moot. Defendant objected. The Court has conducted a de novo review of the record. See D. Minn. LR 72.2(b). Based on that review, the Court adopts the Report and Recommendation. Therefore, IT IS ORDERED THAT:

1. Defendant's Motion for Suppression of Evidence Obtained as a Result of Search and Seizure [Docket No. 25] is GRANTED as to information relating solely to American General and DENIED in all other respects.
2. Defendants' Motion to Suppress Statements, Admissions and Answers [Docket No. 26] is DENIED AS MOOT.


Summaries of

U.S. v. Graham

United States District Court, D. Minnesota
Apr 20, 2009
Criminal No. 08-251 (JNE/JJG) (D. Minn. Apr. 20, 2009)
Case details for

U.S. v. Graham

Case Details

Full title:United States of America, Plaintiff, v. Jeffrey Scot Graham, Defendant

Court:United States District Court, D. Minnesota

Date published: Apr 20, 2009

Citations

Criminal No. 08-251 (JNE/JJG) (D. Minn. Apr. 20, 2009)

Citing Cases

U.S. v. Cohan

"), overruled on other grounds by Cleveland v. United States, 531 U.S. 12 (2000); United States v. Shilling,…

United States v. Young

Given the defendant's use of burner phones and anonymous email accounts for communication, Complaint Aff. ¶…