Summary
In United States v. Fenstermaker, [No. 07-78 (DSD/RLE),] 2007 WL 1242891 (D. Minn. [Apr. 27, 2007]), the Court denied as moot two motions to suppress evidence after the government advised the Court that it would not offer the evidence in its case in chief at trial.
Summary of this case from United States v. QuallsOpinion
Crim. No. 07-78 (DSD/RLE).
April 27, 2007
ORDER ADOPTING THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
Based upon the Findings and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge Raymond L. Erickson, and after an independent review of the files, records and proceedings in the above-titled matter, IT IS ORDERED that:
1. That the Defendant's Motion to Suppress Statements, Admissions, and Answers [Docket No. 16] is denied as moot.
2. That the Defendant's Motion to Suppress Evidence Obtained as a Result of Search and Seizure [Docket No. 19] is denied as moot.