From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States ex rel. Walther v. District Director of Immigration & Naturalization

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
May 25, 1951
189 F.2d 517 (2d Cir. 1951)

Opinion

No. 285, Docket 22030.

Argued May 7, 1951.

Decided May 25, 1951.

Edward L. Dubroff, Brooklyn, N.Y., for appellant.

Irving H. Saypol, U.S. Atty., New York City (William J. Sexton, Asst. U.S. Atty., and Lester Friedman, Atty., Immigration and Naturalization Service, Department of Justice, New York City, of counsel), for appellee.

Before SWAN, AUGUSTUS N. HAND and CLARK, Circuit Judges.


This habeas corpus proceeding was formerly before this court in United States ex rel. Walther v. District Director, 175 F.2d 693. We there directed that the petition remain undecided until the relator's naturalization proceeding be concluded, and the deportation order and warrant be meanwhile stayed. Thereafter Congress enacted section 27 of the Internal Security Act of 1950, 8 U.S.C.A. § 729(c), which provides that "No person shall be naturalized against whom there is outstanding a final finding of deportability * * *" In United States ex rel. Jankowski v. Shaughnessy, 186 F.2d 580, 582, we said that this legislation "explicitly devitalizes our decision" in United States ex rel. Walther v. District Director, 175 F.2d 693. Accordingly the order is affirmed.


Summaries of

United States ex rel. Walther v. District Director of Immigration & Naturalization

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
May 25, 1951
189 F.2d 517 (2d Cir. 1951)
Case details for

United States ex rel. Walther v. District Director of Immigration & Naturalization

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES ex rel. WALTHER v. DISTRICT DIRECTOR of IMMIGRATION and…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit

Date published: May 25, 1951

Citations

189 F.2d 517 (2d Cir. 1951)

Citing Cases

Petition of Santos

Shaughnessy v. Pedreiro, 1955, 349 U.S. 48, 75 S.Ct. 591, 99 L.Ed. 868. A naturalization proceeding, however,…

In re Terzich's Petition

It is of some significance that none of the courts which have so far considered the provision barring…