From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. Charles

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Feb 27, 2002
284 F.3d 567 (5th Cir. 2002)

Opinion

No. 01-10113.

February 27, 2002.

Nancy E. Larson, Asst. U.S. Atty., Fort Worth, TX, Chad Eugene Meacham, Dallas, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

George Andrew Platt, Westfall, Platt Cutrer, Fort Worth, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas; John H. McBryde, Judge.

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC

(Opinion Dec. 10, 2001, 5 Cir., 2001, 275 F.3d 468)

Before KING, Chief Judge, and JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, JONES, SMITH, WIENER, BARKSDALE, EMILIO M. GARZA, DeMOSS, BENAVIDES, STEWART, PARKER, DENNIS and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.


BY THE COURT:

A member of the Court in active service having requested a poll on the petition for rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,

IT IS ORDERED that this cause shall be reheard by the court en banc with oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. The Clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of supplemental briefs.


Summaries of

U.S. v. Charles

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Feb 27, 2002
284 F.3d 567 (5th Cir. 2002)
Case details for

U.S. v. Charles

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Joseph Clifton CHARLES…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit

Date published: Feb 27, 2002

Citations

284 F.3d 567 (5th Cir. 2002)

Citing Cases

U.S. v. Charles

A majority of active judges then voted to hear the case en banc. United States v. Charles, 284 F.3d 567 (5th…