From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. Centeno

United States District Court, S.D. California
Oct 15, 2009
Case No. 09CR3120-L (S.D. Cal. Oct. 15, 2009)

Opinion


UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. MARIA CENTENO, Defendant. No. 09CR3120-L. United States District Court, S.D. California. October 15, 2009

          ORDER

          M. JAMES LORENZ, District Judge.

         Defendant Maria Centeno filed a motion for the Marshals Service to provide travel and subsistence funds under 18 U.S.C. § 4285.

         Section 4285 provides that when an indigent defendant is released pending a court appearance, a judge "may, when the interests of justice would be served thereby... direct the United States marshal to arrange for that person's means of noncustodial transportation or furnish the fare for such transportation to the place where his appearance is required, and in addition may direct the United States marshal to furnish that person with an amount of money for subsistence expenses to his destination, not to exceed the amount authorized as a per diem allowance for travel under section 5702(a) of title 5, United States Code." 18 U.S.C. § 4285. However, section 4285 only allows payment of one-way travel to a court appearance, and not for costs of return travel. See e.g. United States v. Gonzales , 684 F.Supp. 838, 841 (D.Vt.1988) ("There is no authority to pay for defendant's return to [home] after the court proceeding."); United States v. Sandoval , 812 F.Supp. 1156, 1157 (D.Kan. 1993); United States v. Birdhorse , 2007 WL 2358634, *2 (D.N.D. 2007); United States v. Badalamenti , 1986 WL 8309 (S.D.N.Y. 1986). Further, the statute does not authorize payment for subsistence or lodging during trial. See e.g. United States v. James , 762 F.Supp. 1, 2 (D.D.C. 1991) ("while the statute authorizes payment to travel to the court, once at the site of the court, the statute does not authorize payment of subsistence during the course of the trial or hearing"); United States v. Haley , 504 F.Supp.1124, 1129 (E.D. Pa. 1981) ("[T]he statute does not authorize subsistence funding for defendants once they arrive at the place of trial and during trial, which could be extended."); Sandoval , 812 F.Supp. at 1157 ("[W]hile the court may require the Marshal to provide money for subsistence during transit, this statute does not authorize the court to enter an order requiring the Marshal to provide money for subsistence upon reaching [the place of trial.]"); United States v. Nave , 733 F.Supp. 1002 (D. Md. 1990).

The Pretrial Services Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3152-3156, requires the Pretrial Services Agency to provide food and shelter to indigent defendants during trial. See United States v. Gunderson , 978 F.2d 580, 584-85 (10th Cir. 1992).

         Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant Maria Centeno's motion is GRANTED, but only to the extent of travel expenses for one-way transportation. The United States Marshals service shall furnish Ms. Centeno with transportation and subsistence funds, not to exceed the amount authorized by law, from Anaheim, California to San Diego, California to attend her trial on October 20, 2009.

         IT IS SO ORDERED.

See also United States v. Nave


Summaries of

U.S. v. Centeno

United States District Court, S.D. California
Oct 15, 2009
Case No. 09CR3120-L (S.D. Cal. Oct. 15, 2009)
Case details for

U.S. v. Centeno

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. MARIA CENTENO (1), Defendant

Court:United States District Court, S.D. California

Date published: Oct 15, 2009

Citations

Case No. 09CR3120-L (S.D. Cal. Oct. 15, 2009)

Citing Cases

United States v. Villegas-Suarez

See H.R.Rep. No. 95-1653, 95th Cong., 2d Sess. at 3 (1978), U.S.Code Cong. & Admin.News 1978, pp. 3732, 3733…

United States v. Otake

The undersigned is unaware of any case interpretation of § 4285 which would permit defendant's round trip…